§

Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC

366 NLRB No. 173 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 274 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    833 F.3d 210 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding pretext where the company's discharge decision was "inconsistent with" other disciplinary decisions and "deviated from the Company's progressive disciplinary policy"

  4. Dorsey Trailers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    233 F.3d 831 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that as long as employer decision requires capital expenditure, decision is outside duty to bargain

  5. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  6. Bruce Packing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.3d 18 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 12–1054 12–1137. 07-24-2015 BRUCE PACKING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Laborers' International Union of North America, Local No. 296, AFL–CIO, Intervenor. Bryan P. O'Connor argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Joseph E. Schuler and Joel J. Borovsky. Nicole Lancia, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy

  7. Nursing v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    164 F.3d 867 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that an employer could only distribute its proposal to union employees when the proposal was "properly before" the union

  8. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  9. STAGEHANDS REFER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELA

    315 F. App'x 318 (2d Cir. 2009)   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 07-2126-ag (L), 07-3103-ag (xap). March 12, 2009. Petition of Petitioners-Cross-Respondents for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated August 31, 2006. Petition of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") for the enforcement of that Order. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED and the cross-petition for enforcement is GRANTED. Leon M. Rosenblatt, Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt, West

  10. North Star Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    974 F.2d 68 (8th Cir. 1992)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 91-3437, 91-3673. Submitted May 15, 1992. Decided September 1, 1992. John C. Zwakman, Minneapolis, Minn., argued, for petitioner. William Baudler, Washington, D.C., argued (Paul J. Spielberg, Michael J. Gan, Jerry M. Hunter, D. Randall Frye and Aileen A. Armstrong, on the brief), for respondent. Review of decision of National Labor Relations Board. Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, LAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge. This case arises from