§

Owen's IGA Foodliner

188 N.L.R.B. 277 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Owen's IGA Foodliner

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

    397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."

  4. Clark's Gamble Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    422 F.2d 845 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 18354. March 4, 1970. Shawe Rosenthal, Earle K. Shawe, Robert S. Hillman, Baltimore, Md., on brief of petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Associate Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assts. Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief for respondent. Plone, Tomar, Parks Seliger, by Howard S. Simonoff, Camden, N.J., of counsel, S.G. Lippman, Gen. Counsel Retail Clerks International Assn., AFL-CIO, on brief for intervenor. Before WEICK, Chief Judge

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Trama

    293 F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17041. July 24, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Vivian Asplund, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for the N.L.R.B. Howard E. Miller, San Pedro, Cal., for petitioner. Ben Margolis, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The position of two unions competing for the allegiance of the fishermen of this single boat operator, Trama