§

Overnite Transportation Co.

161 N.L.R.B. 461 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Overnite Transportation Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  2. Overnite Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    372 F.2d 765 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times

    Nos. 10570, 10617. Argued November 4, 1966. Decided February 6, 1967. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Ernest W. Machen, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioner Overnite Transp. Co. Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C., (Michael F. Grdina, Willoughby, Ohio, on brief), for petitioner Teamsters Local Union No. 171. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transportation Company

    308 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times

    No. 8497. Argued March 22, 1962. Decided September 4, 1962. Robert Sewell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (J.W. Alexander, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transportation Company

    308 F.2d 284 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times

    No. 8507. Argued March 22, 1962. Decided September 4, 1962. Robert Sewell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Ernest W. Machen, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and

  6. Overnite Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1963)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 8972, 9000. Argued September 26, 1963. Decided December 27, 1963. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioner Overnite Transp. Co. Robert J. Sanders (Sanders Walker, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioners, Jack Eudy and others. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief),

  7. Truck Drivers Helpers, 728 v. N.L.R.B

    364 F.2d 682 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 19703, 19720. Argued March 16, 1966. Decided June 28, 1966. Mr. David R. Richards, Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19,703. Mrs. Janet Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent in No. 19

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,111 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"