Overland Hauling, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Young v. Fire Ins. Exchange
338 U.S. 912 (1950) Cited 215 times
Holding that the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari does not support the conclusion that either the majority or the dissent at the prior levels correctly applied the law
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.
415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 95 times
In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bata Shoe Co.
377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir. 1967) Cited 65 times
In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.
N.L.R.B. v. Air Ctrl. Prod. of St. Petersburg
335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 54 times
No. 21017. July 28, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lawrence Gold, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is another § 8(a)(5), 29
N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.
297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 50 times
In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.
N.L.R.B. v. Magnesium Casting Company
427 F.2d 114 (1st Cir. 1970) Cited 26 times
No. 7462. May 21, 1970. Abigail Cooley Baskir, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marshall F. Berman, Washington, D.C., Attorney, were on the brief, for petitioner. Jerome H. Somers, Boston, Mass., with whom Louis Chandler and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on the brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, COFFIN, Circuit Judge, and BOWNES, District Judge. COFFIN
Intertype Company v. N.L.R.B
401 F.2d 41 (4th Cir. 1968) Cited 23 times
No. 11561. Argued April 2, 1968. Decided August 23, 1968. Certiorari Denied January 20, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 686. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Washington, D.C. (Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., and Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Winchester, Va., on brief), for petitioner. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent
Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Co. v. N.L.R.B
409 F.2d 676 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 20 times
In Pepsi-Cola the Board, because of its restrictive regulations, had merely "rubber-stamped" the Regional Director's determination on the concededly difficult issue whether certain distributors were independent contractors or employees.
Follett Corporation v. N.L.R.B
397 F.2d 91 (7th Cir. 1968) Cited 20 times
No. 16221. June 10, 1968. Robert C. Claus, James S. Petrie, John P. Jacoby, Chicago, Ill., Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief Judge, and SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. Follett Corporation
Section 159 - Representatives and elections
29 U.S.C. § 159 Cited 2,441 times 12 Legal Analyses
Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it

Overland Hauling, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

Holding that the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari does not support the conclusion that either the majority or the dissent at the prior levels correctly applied the law

In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.

In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.

In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

In Pepsi-Cola the Board, because of its restrictive regulations, had merely "rubber-stamped" the Regional Director's determination on the concededly difficult issue whether certain distributors were independent contractors or employees.

Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it