§

Over-The-Road, City Transfer, Cold Storage, Grocery And Market Drivers And Helpers, Inside Employees, Local Union No. 544

274 N.L.R.B. 164 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Over-The-Road, City Transfer, Cold Storage, Grocery And Market Drivers And Helpers, Inside Employees, Local Union No. 544

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Int. Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    604 F.2d 1091 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 265, 604 F.2d 1091, 1097 (8th Cir. 1979), under circumstances clearly analogous to those involved in the present case, this court addressed the issue of proscribed recognitional picketing under Section 8(b)(7)(A), and the exception to that section for "area standards" picketing.

  3. Centralia Bldg. Const. Trades v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 18 times
    In Centralia, moreover, the court emphasized that the employer "would have been required to throw open its records as to such payments that monthly inspection might be made" by the picketing union.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 745

    450 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 8 times
    Noting that the statute of limitations in the National Labor Relations Act is "not a rule of evidence" and approving consideration of events outside the statute of limitations to the extent they "might . . . throw[] light on the specific conduct within the period at issue"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Retail Clerks Internat'l Ass'n

    404 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 2 times

    No. 22515. December 18, 1968. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D.C., (argued) and Thomas Silfen, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Charles M. Arak, (argued), Robert M. Dohrmann, (argued) of Arnold, Smith Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Ted R. Frame, (argued), of Frame Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for intervenor