§

Outboard Marine Corp.

142 N.L.R.B. 1246 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Outboard Marine Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters Local v. Lucas Flour Co.

    369 U.S. 95 (1962)   Cited 1,181 times
    Holding that "under the mandate of Lincoln Mills " federal labor law is "paramount" when deciding issues raised under § 301

  2. Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.

    306 U.S. 332 (1939)   Cited 139 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

  3. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  4. Wah Chang Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    305 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    No. 16652. June 25, 1962. Weatherford Thompson, and Orval N. Thompson, Albany, Or., for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsels, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Earle W. Putnam, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., and Thomas P. Graham, Jr., Director, National Labor Relations Board, Seattle, Wash., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Scullin Steel Co.

    161 F.2d 143 (8th Cir. 1947)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Scullin Steel Co., 161 F.2d 143, the Eighth Circuit held that the company was not responsible for remarks as to labor matters by minor supervisors who had no real supervisory authority, who were included among the employees eligible to vote in an election conducted in a unit of non-supervisory employees, and who were actually only key men not entitled to any additional compensation.