§

Ott's Vacuum Truck Service

174 N.L.R.B. 1080 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Ott's Vacuum Truck Service

10 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Fitzgerald Mills Corporation

    313 F.2d 260 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 35 times

    Nos. 31, 32, 33, Dockets 27422, 27224, 27318. Argued October 11, 1962. Decided January 9, 1963. Morton Nambow, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Edward Wynne, New York City (Benjamin Wyle, New York City, on the brief), for Textile Workers Union. Theodore R. Iserman, New York City (Kelley Drye Newhall Maginnes

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Coast Casket Co.

    205 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13515. June 30, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Coun., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Coun., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Coun., Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James S. Duberg and Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, petitions for enforcement of an order

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Phaostron Instrument Elec. Co.

    344 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 19505. April 27, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Michael R. Brown, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Erwin Lerten, Potruch Lerten, Beverly Hills, Cal., for respondent. Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. ELY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks full enforcement of its Order (146 N.L.R.B. No. 124), issued after a hearing and

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Brothers Pet Supply, Inc.

    325 F.2d 68 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 18 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Brothers Pet Supply, Inc., 325 F.2d 68 (6th Cir. 1963), there was no dispute as to the occurrence of unfair labor practices, such as the employer's statement to several employees that "he would never sign a union contract, and... he would close his business before admitting the union."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Preston Feed Corporation

    309 F.2d 346 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 12 times

    No. 8555. Argued May 30, 1962. Decided October 5, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C. (Charles V. Wehner, Kingwood, W. Va., and Steptoe Johnson, Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Fosdal

    367 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 6 times
    Stating a union sufficiently requests bargaining when "the employer understands that a demand is being made" through "clear implication"

  9. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    343 F.2d 329 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 18839, 18877. Argued January 26, 1965. Decided February 18, 1965. Mr. James Graham, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioner in No. 18,839. Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief for petitioner in No. 18,839. Mr. Richard P. Lawlor, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Idaho Egg Producers

    229 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 5 times

    No. 14700. February 1, 1956. Theophil C. Kamholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Robert Tillman, Frederick U. Reel, John Francis Lawless, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, J.L. Eberle, Richards, Haga Eberle, Boise, Idaho, for appellee. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This matter is before us on petition of the NLRB for enforcement of its