Otis Elevator Company

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
388 U.S. 175 (1967) Cited 334 times
Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 times
Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
394 U.S. 423 (1969) Cited 117 times 6 Legal Analyses
Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 340
481 U.S. 573 (1987) Cited 33 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding union's policy of fining members who worked for employers not part of a CBA with the union to not constitute an unfair labor practice
N.L.R.B. v. General Teamsters Local 439
175 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 1 times
No. 98-70253 Argued and Submitted March 8, 1999 — San Francisco, California. Filed May 26, 1999 COUNSEL David Habenstreit, Elinor L. Merberg (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. David A. Rosenfeld (argued), Ellen Moscowitz, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, Oakland, California, for the respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, NLRB Nos. 32-CB-4602, 32-CB-4604. Before: Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain and Kim
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.
169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 46 times
In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.

Otis Elevator Company

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 340

Holding union's policy of fining members who worked for employers not part of a CBA with the union to not constitute an unfair labor practice

N.L.R.B. v. General Teamsters Local 439

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.