§

Osceola Farms Co.

141 N.L.R.B. 458 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Osceola Farms Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  2. St. Louis Independent Packing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    291 F.2d 700 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13229. June 21, 1961. George V. Gallagher, Chicago, Ill., Arthur C. O'Meara, Donald H. Bussman, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Ann Leonard, Chicago, Ill., amicus curiæ. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Julius G. Getman, Attorney, Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, CASTLE, Circuit Judge, and GRUBB, District

  3. Art Metals Const. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    110 F.2d 148 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 38 times

    No. 163. February 26, 1940. On Petition to set aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Art Metals Construction Company, an employer, to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, directing the employer to bargain collectively with a labor union and its employees, not to interfere with their right to organize, to put in writing any agreement it may reach with them, and to post the usual notices of compliance, wherein the Board requested an enforcement order

  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    200 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 14079. December 2, 1952. Roy C. Ledbetter, Dallas, Tex., James T. Fitzpatrick, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner. Samuel M. Singer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Feeling itself aggrieved by the findings and order of the Board, petitioner seeks to set the order aside while the Board, in