§

Orval Kent Food Co.

268 N.L.R.B. 753 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
Orval Kent Food Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Broadmoor Lumber Co.

    578 F.2d 238 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times

    No. 77-1874. June 16, 1978. Rehearing Denied July 12, 1978. Howard F. Fine (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry Finkle (argued), of Littler, Mendelson Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Squire Shops, Inc.

    559 F.2d 486 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 3 times

    No. 75-3067. July 28, 1977. As Amended August 8, 18, 1977. John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued for petitioner. J. Markham Marshall, Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis Fletcher, Seattle, Wash., argued for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUFSTEDLER, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge. The Board applies for enforcement of its order requiring Squire Shops to cease and desist from unfair labor practices

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Tayko Industries, Inc.

    543 F.2d 1120 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 3 times

    No. 75-1147. October 29, 1976. William Stewart, Atty. (argued), of NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Mark Montobbio (argued), of Severson, Werson, Berke Melchoir, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before TRASK, GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. TRASK, Circuit Judge: Upon charges filed by Automotive Teamsters and Chauffeurs Local 165 that Tayko Industries, Inc. (Tayko) had engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations