§

Ormet Aluminum Mill Products Corp.

335 N.L.R.B. 788 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Ormet Aluminum Mill Products Corp.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc.

    39 F.3d 1410 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant

  5. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 41 times

    Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of

  7. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  8. Bryant Stratton Bus. v. National Labor rel

    140 F.3d 169 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that the employer did not violate the Act where its required use of a sign-in board was a "reaffirmation of its previous policy and not a change in the employee's terms and conditions of employment of unit employees"

  9. Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that waiver of statutory rights can be effectuated only if "intent to waive is clear and unmistakable from the evidence presented"

  10. Package Service Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    113 F.3d 845 (8th Cir. 1997)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 96-2548, 96-2766 Submitted January 13, 1997 Filed May 14, 1997 Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was James A. Prozzi. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Deborah E. Shrager of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. Appeals from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LOKEN, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. LOKEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns the back pay remedy under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §(s) 151 et seq

  11. Rule 1006 - Summaries to Prove Content

    Fed. R. Evid. 1006   Cited 1,799 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a "summary, chart, or calculation to prove the content of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs that cannot be conveniently examined in court."