Orenduff & Kappel, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Diaz v. United States
223 U.S. 442 (1912) Cited 850 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that double jeopardy was not implicated when a defendant was tried for assault, then subsequently tried for murder after the victim of the assault passed away a few weeks later
Martel Mills Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
114 F.2d 624 (4th Cir. 1940) Cited 56 times
In Martel Mills Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 114 F.2d 624, the rules by which we are to be guided in making this determination have been clearly stated by Judge Dobie. As he points out the difficulty is that they are very much simpler to state than to apply.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Motor Co.
114 F.2d 905 (6th Cir. 1940) Cited 52 times
No. 8399. October 8, 1940. As Amended December 5, 1940. Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., against the Ford Motor Company, wherein the Ford Motor Company cross-petitioned to review and set aside the order pursuant to National Labor Relations Act, § 10(f), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(f). Judgment in accordance with opinion
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward
242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957) Cited 23 times
No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ray Smith Transport
193 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1951) Cited 28 times
No. 13612. December 20, 1951. Elmer Davis, Ch. Law Officer, NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, W.D. White, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and STRUM, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Exonerating the trial examiner of specific charges of unfairness and bias, and adopting substantially whole his findings, conclusions and recommendations
American Rubber Prod. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
214 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1954) Cited 12 times
Relying upon Diaz

Orenduff & Kappel, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

Holding that double jeopardy was not implicated when a defendant was tried for assault, then subsequently tried for murder after the victim of the assault passed away a few weeks later

In Martel Mills Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 114 F.2d 624, the rules by which we are to be guided in making this determination have been clearly stated by Judge Dobie. As he points out the difficulty is that they are very much simpler to state than to apply.

Relying upon Diaz