Oregon Teamsters' Security Plan Office

Office Employes v. Labor Board
353 U.S. 313 (1957) Cited 54 times
Holding that, when a union acts as an employer, it is deemed an employer within the meaning of the NLRA and subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB
NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. BETTER MONKEY GRIP
243 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1957) Cited 14 times
No. 16278. May 1, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 29, 1957. Owsley Vose, Stephen Leonard, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herbert S. Bonney, Jr., William L. Keller, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(e) of the National Labor Relations
Office Employees Int. Un. v. N.L.R.B
235 F.2d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1956) Cited 1 times
No. 12896. Argued March 19, 1956. Decided June 21, 1956. Mr. Joseph E. Finley, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Miss Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, was on the brief, for respondent. Messrs. Clifford D. O'Brien and Richard Frank, Washington, D.C., filed a brief as amici curiae, urging affirmance. Before PRETTYMAN, BAZELON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges. PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge