§

Oregon State Employees Assn.

242 N.L.R.B. 976 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Oregon State Employees Assn.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Miller Redwood Company

    407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 42 times

    No. 22573. February 25, 1969. Herbert Fishgold, Washington, D.C. (argued), Janet Kohn, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Carrell F. Bradley (argued), of Schwenn, Bradley Batchelor, Hillsboro, Or., for respondent. Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges. J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge, United

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Doctors' Hospital of Modesto, Inc.

    489 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 27 times
    Accepting the Board's finding that registered nurses, who sometimes assigned and directed auxiliary personnel, were not supervisors

  5. Oil, Chemical Atomic Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    445 F.2d 237 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 23295, 23300, 23750, 23751. Argued November 3, 1970. Decided May 27, 1971. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Marvin J. Martin, with whom Mr. W. Stanley Churchill, Wichita, Kan., was on the brief, for petitioner in Nos. 23,750 and 23,751 and intervenor in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Joseph E. Mayer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, for respondent. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel

  6. Community Hosp. of Roanoke Val. v. N.L.R.B

    538 F.2d 607 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 14 times
    Holding protected a television interview in which a nurse complained of hospital staff shortages, and suggested that they were related to low pay

  7. N.L.R.B. v. City Yellow Cab Company

    344 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that at times where no representatives of management were present, switch-board operators were not supervisors in part because company officers were at all times reachable by phone

  8. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir. 1970)   Cited 20 times
    In Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S.Ct. 63, 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970), the Seventh Circuit permitted the Board to use a 50% formula to determine whether certain workers could vote in a union election.

  9. Pulley v. N.L.R.B

    395 F.2d 870 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times
    Soliciting of an employee to engage in surveillance of union activities

  10. Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    366 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times
    In Retail Clerks International Assn. v. NLRB, supra, MR. CHIEF JUSTICE (then Circuit Judge) BURGER explained the Board's policy on "managerial employees": "The Board also excludes from the protections of the Act, as managerial employees, 'those who formulate, determine, and effectuate an employer's policies,' AFL-CIO, [120 N.L.R.B. 969, 973 (1958)], and those who have discretion in the performance of their jobs, but not if the discretion must conform to an employer's established policy, Eastern Camera and Photo Corp., 140 N.L.R.B. 569, 571 (1963) (store managers who could set prices are not managerial).