Ordont Orthodontic Laboratories, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 22 times
In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.
East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B
322 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 19 times
Nos. 17275, 17468. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided July 3, 1963. Petitions for Rehearing Before the Division Denied September 27, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1963. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17275 and intervenors in No. 17468. Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., was
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Coach Body Company
336 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 14 times
No. 20744. September 14, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Paula Omansky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. M.A. Prowell, Frank A. Constangy, Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. Senior Circuit Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement of an
White v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
255 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1958) Cited 18 times
In White v. NLRB, 255 F.2d 564, 565 (5th Cir. 1958), five of sixty employees were granted raises, all before bargaining commenced following certification.

Ordont Orthodontic Laboratories, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Labor Board v. Parts Co.

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.

East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B

N.L.R.B. v. Southern Coach Body Company

White v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

In White v. NLRB, 255 F.2d 564, 565 (5th Cir. 1958), five of sixty employees were granted raises, all before bargaining commenced following certification.