§

Orange Belt District Council Of Painters No. 48, Afl--Cio, Clc

276 N.L.R.B. 1372 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Orange Belt District Council Of Painters No. 48, Afl--Cio, Clc

7 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Connell Co. v. Plumbers Steamfitters

    421 U.S. 616 (1975)   Cited 285 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agreement between a union and a nonlabor party, which is wholly-unrelated to any collective-bargaining effort on the part of the union and which operates or threatens to operate as a restraint on trade, may be the basis for a federal antitrust suit

  3. Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    405 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.

  5. Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  6. Bricklayers Stone Masons Union v. N.L.R.B

    562 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 8 times
    In Bricklayers, the Board found that the picket line clauses of the bricklayers', laborers', engineers', and plumbers' unions were in violation of section 8(e) of the Act because the clauses were broad enough as written or applied to sanction refusals to cross secondary picket lines, and the clauses were not saved by virtue of the construction industry proviso to section 8(e).

  7. Orange Belt Dis. Coun., Painters v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 540 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 17388, 19990. Argued June 13, 1966. Decided July 14, 1966. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Los Angeles, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher and David S. Barr, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,388 and respondents in No. 19,990. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel