§

Oppenheim Collins & Co., Inc.

79 N.L.R.B. 435 (N.L.R.B. 1948)
Oppenheim Collins & Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Switchmen's Union v. Board

    320 U.S. 297 (1943)   Cited 412 times
    Holding federal courts do not have jurisdiction to review the Board's certification decision

  2. Buttfield v. Stranahan

    192 U.S. 470 (1904)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Denying that Congress may "invest administrative officials with the power of legislation"

  3. Commonwealth v. Cronin

    336 Pa. 469 (Pa. 1939)   Cited 56 times
    In Commonwealth v. Cronin, 336 Pa. 469, 9 A.2d 408 (1939), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a hearing de novo in the court of common pleas on appeal from an order of the Secretary of Revenue suspending his driver's license "protected" defendant against an arbitrary exercise of power by the Secretary.

  4. National Maritime Union of America v. Herzog

    78 F. Supp. 146 (D.D.C. 1948)   Cited 34 times

    Civ. No. 4874-'47. April 13, 1948. Judgment Affirmed June 21, 1948. William L. Standard, of New York City, David Rein and Joseph Forer (of Greenberg, Forer Rein), of Washington D.C. and Herman Rosenfeld, of New York City, for plaintiffs. Robert W. Kenny, President, of Los Angeles, Cal., Robert J. Silberstein, Executive Secretary, of New York City, Richard F. Watt, Chairman, Labor Law Committee, and Edmund Hatfield, both of Chicago, Ill., amicus curiae, for National Lawyers Guild. A. Norman Somers

  5. State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court

    5 Cal.App.2d 374 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)   Cited 36 times

    Docket No. 9788. March 20, 1935. PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and E.P. Shortall, Judge thereof, to set aside temporary injunctions. Peremptory writ of prohibition granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Petitioners. Harry A. McKenzie, J.H. Sapiro and Raymond D. Williamson for Respondents. THE COURT. The State Board of Equalization granted

  6. Fay v. Douds

    79 F. Supp. 582 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 2 times

    July 2, 1948. Frank Scheiner, and Morton Stavis, both of New York City, for plaintiff. Mozart G. Ratner, and Morton J. Come, both of Washington, D.C., for defendant. On motion for reargument. Motion granted and original decision adhered to. For original decision, see 78 F. Supp. 703. RIFKIND, District Judge. The motion for reargument made by plaintiff calls to my attention the amendment of the complaint which raises the constitutional issue reserved in the opinion filed herein on June 14, 1948. The