Civ. No. 3563. June 6, 1961. Milo V. Price, Area Injunction Atty., N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Anderson D. Ward, of Minne Sorenson, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondents. KILKENNY, District Judge. This is a proceeding by the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (herein called Board) under the provisions of section 10( l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, ( 61 Stat. 149, 73 Stat. 544) 29 U.S.C.A. § 160( l) (herein called the Act) for a temporary injunction
Civ. A. No. 585-62. August 16, 1962. Bernard L. Balicer, Howard I. Grossman, Washington, D.C., with N.L.R.B., and Stanley A. Mestel, (Wyoming Bar), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph P. Dunn, Newark, N.J., and Robert D. Corbin, Jersey City, N.J., for respondent. WORTENDYKE, District Judge. Pursuant to the provisions of section 10( l) of the National Labor Relations Act, 1947, (Act), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160( l), the Regional Director (Petitioner) of the Twenty-Second Region of the National Labor Relations
Civ. A. No. 10980. April 14, 1961. Marvin Roth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, C. Paul Barker, Thomas J. Meunier, New Orleans, La., for respondent. WRIGHT, District Judge. Invoking Section 10( l) of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160( l), and alleging that there is reasonable cause to believe that the respondent Union is guilty of unfair labor practices toward Binnings Construction Company, the general contractor for the construction of a sewage disposal plant
No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys