Operating Engineers, Local No. 12

Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
N.L.R.B. v. Davison
318 F.2d 550 (4th Cir. 1963) Cited 16 times
No. 8759. Argued January 11, 1963. Decided May 28, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Lee M. Modjeska, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for petitioner. William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C. (Charles G. Williamson, Jr., and Steptoe Johnson, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and BRYAN