Operating Engineers Local 3 (Joy Engineering)

12 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    363 U.S. 564 (1960)   Cited 2,229 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
  2. John Wiley Sons v. Livingston

    376 U.S. 543 (1964)   Cited 1,771 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  4. Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.

    361 U.S. 459 (1960)   Cited 255 times
    Holding that where the fund's governing documents require that it be used for the sole and exclusive benefit of the employees, their families, and dependents, "the fund is in no way an asset or property of the union."
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Cloth. Wkrs.

    430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 486 times

    No. 28680. August 12, 1970. Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., 15th Region, New Orleans, La., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Michael S. Winer, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Robert J. Rabin, Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, Ronald K. Fisher, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and BELL and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ENFORCED. See Local Rule 21.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  8. Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.

    309 U.S. 261 (1940)   Cited 211 times
    In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.
  9. Rozay's Transfer v. L. Fre. Drivers

    850 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 49 times
    Discussing reasonable reliance as an element of a claim for fraudulent concealment
  10. International Union, Etc. v. White Motor

    505 F.2d 1193 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 32 times
    In International Union UAW v. White Motor Corp., 505 F.2d 1193, 1198-99 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921, 95 S.Ct. 1588, 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975), we enforced an award because the arbitrator had properly considered the parties' bargaining history and prior agreements in concluding that the absence of an attachment to the collective bargaining agreement was an inadvertent omission.