§

Operating Engineers Local 12 (Hensel Phelps)

284 N.L.R.B. 246 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Operating Engineers Local 12 (Hensel Phelps)

9 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    730 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 17 times
    Reprimanding union as "an incorrigible secondary boycotter with a two decade-long history of secondary boycott activity" and identifying multiple adverse rulings

  5. Intern. Ass'n of Bridge, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times
    Enforcing Board's order finding unlawful inducement in part based on conversations at neutral employer's office gate between union agent and neutral employees who failed to report for work later that day, even though there was no testimony regarding the content of the conversations

  6. Kesner v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    532 F.2d 1169 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 75-1073, 75-1294. Argued November 3, 1975. Decided April 8, 1976. Rehearing Denied in No. 75-1294 May 18, 1976. Sherman Carmell, Aaron Kesner, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Carre, John Ferguson, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and PELL, and BAUER, Circuit Judges. PELL, Circuit Judge. These cases are before the court upon section

  7. Ramey Const. Co., Inc. v. Local U. No. 544

    472 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1275. January 31, 1973. John Cosmic, John W. Broadfoot, Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants. Tom Upchurch, Jr., Amarillo, Tex., Buddy Wright, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Before RIVES, THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the legality of common situs picketing conducted by the defendant-union on numerous construction sites in the Amarillo,

  8. Local 98, United Ass'n of Journeymen v. N.L.R.B

    497 F.2d 60 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 71-1413 and 72-1044. Argued April 4, 1974. Decided June 6, 1974. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul Elkind, Chief, Contempt Litigation, Peter Ames Eveleth, Associate Chief, Contempt Litigation, Charles Donnelly, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner-appellee. Boaz Siegel, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondents-appellants. Petition from the National Labor Relations

  9. NLRB v. Sequoia District Council of Carpenters

    499 F.2d 129 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 3 times

    No. 73-3365. June 28, 1974. Rehearing Denied August 7, 1974. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C. and Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20 NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, Michael B. Roger, of Levy, Van Bourg Hackler, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before KOELSCH, WRIGHT and TRASK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") for enforcement of its order against Sequoia District