§

Operating Engineers Local 101 (Hunt Midwest)

304 N.L.R.B. 722 (N.L.R.B. 1991)
Operating Engineers Local 101 (Hunt Midwest)

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Florida Power Light v. Electrical Workers

    417 U.S. 790 (1974)   Cited 96 times
    In Florida Power Light Co. v. IBEW, Local 641, 417 U.S. 790, 804-05, 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744-45, 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974), the Supreme Court held that no § 8(b)(1)(B) violation occurs unless the disciplined conduct adversely affects the performance of his or her § 8(b)(1)(B) duties.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 340

    481 U.S. 573 (1987)   Cited 33 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding union's policy of fining members who worked for employers not part of a CBA with the union to not constitute an unfair labor practice

  5. American Broadcasting Cos. v. Writers Guild

    437 U.S. 411 (1978)   Cited 27 times
    In American Broadcasting Cos. v. Writers Guild, West, Inc., 437 U.S. 411 (1978) (ABC), the Court found that discipline imposed on grievance-handling supervisors who crossed union picket lines violated § 8(b)(1)(B), even though the supervisor-members did not adjust grievances for the striking employees, but only for employees whom the striking union did not represent or desire to represent.

  6. Rasmussen v. N.L.R.B

    875 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 1 times

    No. 88-7071. Argued and Submitted February 16, 1989. Decided May 24, 1989. Gregory E. Smith, Smith Kotchka, Las Vegas, Nev., for petitioner. Robert F. Mace, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHOY, SNEED and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge: Rasmussen filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alleging that his union local committed an unfair labor practice by fining him

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Symons Manufacturing Co.

    328 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 14305. March 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Michael N. Sohn, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John Harrington and Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and KNOCH, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"