§

Operating Engineers, Loc. No. 139, Et Al.

226 N.L.R.B. 759 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Operating Engineers, Loc. No. 139, Et Al.

9 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Amer. Trucking Ass'ns

    310 U.S. 534 (1940)   Cited 1,677 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  4. Holy Trinity Church v. United States

    143 U.S. 457 (1892)   Cited 923 times
    Holding that although the Alien Contract Labor Act made it a crime to contract with or encourage any alien to migrate to the United States "to perform labor or service of any kind," a cleric who emigrated from England to serve as a pastor of a New York church and thus technically fell within the letter of the Act, was exempt from the Act's reach because of the absurd results that would follow from giving such broad meaning to words of the statute

  5. Labor Board v. Servette

    377 U.S. 46 (1964)   Cited 74 times
    Holding under section 8(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b), that statutory protection for the distribution of handbills would be undermined if a threat to engage in protected conduct were not itself protected

  6. American Bread Company v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    In American Bread, it was physically possible for consumers to bring their own bread or go without, just as it was possible for Kroger shoppers to bring their own bags or go without.

  7. Honolulu Typographical Un. No. 37 v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 952 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 22 times
    Describing how thirty to sixty union members walked "shoulder to shoulder" in an oval in front of picketed businesses' entrances

  8. Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    356 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times
    In Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. NLRB, 356 F.2d 434, 436 (CA9), enf'g 150 N.L.R.B. 467 (1964), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1002 (1966), the court upheld the Board's determination that the handbilling there fell within the publicity proviso and thus was not unlawful, but it stated in dictum that § 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) covered the union activity.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lawrence Typographical Un. # 570

    402 F.2d 452 (10th Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    No. 8851. November 4, 1968. Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Linda R. Sher, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief) for petitioner. George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., and Stanley D. Rostov, Kansas City, Mo., with him on the brief) for respondent. Before LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is at least