Ontario Foods, Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company
304 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 3 timesNo. 19106. June 22, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"