§

OmniSource Corporation

366 NLRB No. 23 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
OmniSource Corporation

17 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Scheffer

    523 U.S. 303 (1998)   Cited 2,013 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the blanket exclusion of polygraph evidence didn't violate the right to present a defense, as the law was "a rational and proportional means of advancing the legitimate interest in barring unreliable evidence"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  3. Johnston v. Cigna Corp.

    514 U.S. 1082 (1995)   Cited 68 times
    Stating "unilaterally obtained polygraph evidence is almost never admissible under Evidence Rule 403."

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. U.S. v. Sherlin

    67 F.3d 1208 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 130 times
    Holding that, in a federal prosecution, the admission of a confession by Sherlin's codefendant did not violate Sherlin's confrontation rights where his name was redacted from the codefendant's confession and the confession did not expressly implicate Sherlin

  6. U.S. v. Scarborough

    43 F.3d 1021 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that issues not raised below are waived and may not be entertained on appeal

  7. King v. Trippett

    192 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 47 times
    Finding no error in trial court's refusal to allow polygraph results

  8. Conti v. C.I.R

    39 F.3d 658 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 43 times
    Holding that polygraph evidence is almost never admissible under Rule 403

  9. Mohave Electric Cooperative v. N.L.R.B

    206 F.3d 1183 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times
    Filing petition for injunction against employer harassment supported by fellow employees and joined by a co-worker was protected concerted activity

  10. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  11. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,303 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity