Omaha World-Herald

11 Cited authorities

Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
501 U.S. 190 (1991) Cited 803 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 314 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board
350 U.S. 270 (1956) Cited 403 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.
385 U.S. 421 (1967) Cited 117 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
Beverly Health Rehab. Serv. v. N.L.R.B
317 F.3d 316 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 18 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding no unfairness where the plaintiff “had every incentive to—and did—litigate the issue before the [previous court]”
BP Amoco Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
217 F.3d 869 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Cited 18 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statement in a collective-bargaining agreement that "Benefit plans for the Company ... will continue in force during the life of this Agreement" was sufficient to incorporate the company’s health-insurance plan by reference (alteration in original)
N.L.R.B. v. Unbelievable, Inc.
71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 23 times 1 Legal Analyses
In NLRB v. Unbelievable, Inc., 71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995), we upheld the Board's finding that the employer "engaged in unfair labor practices by eavesdropping on private conversations between employees and [a] Union representative," which occurred in the employee break room.
Visiting Nurse Services of Western Massachusetts, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
177 F.3d 52 (1st Cir. 1999) Cited 12 times
Rejecting employer's suggestion that a union cannot insist on negotiating an entire contract rather than piecemeal negotiation
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

Omaha World-Herald

11 Cited authorities

Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

Finding no unfairness where the plaintiff “had every incentive to—and did—litigate the issue before the [previous court]”

Holding that a statement in a collective-bargaining agreement that "Benefit plans for the Company ... will continue in force during the life of this Agreement" was sufficient to incorporate the company’s health-insurance plan by reference (alteration in original)

In NLRB v. Unbelievable, Inc., 71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995), we upheld the Board's finding that the employer "engaged in unfair labor practices by eavesdropping on private conversations between employees and [a] Union representative," which occurred in the employee break room.

Rejecting employer's suggestion that a union cannot insist on negotiating an entire contract rather than piecemeal negotiation

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.