Olin Corp.

18 Cited authorities

Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,612 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,893 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,229 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills
353 U.S. 448 (1957) Cited 2,323 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts
Republic Steel v. Maddox
379 U.S. 650 (1965) Cited 1,175 times
Holding that an "employee must afford the union the opportunity to act on his behalf
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 311 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pincus Bros.
620 F.2d 367 (3d Cir. 1980) Cited 36 times
In Pincus Brothers, the Third Circuit merely concluded that, under the particular facts of that case, it was "at least arguable" that the employee published a defamatory statement known to be false.
Banyard v. N.L.R.B
505 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1974) Cited 35 times
In Banyard v. NLRB, 505 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1974), the District of Columbia Circuit reviewed decisions by the Board to defer to an arbitrator's award.
Stephenson v. N.L.R.B
550 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 30 times
In Stephenson v. N.L.R.B., 550 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1977), this court also expressly rejected Electronic Reproduction, finding it an "unjustifiable extension" of the Board's deferral policy.
Ad Art, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
645 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 22 times
No. 78-3371. Argued February 14, 1980. Submitted May 22, 1980. Decided December 9, 1980. As Amended January 30, 1981. Archie G. Parker, Rowland Parker, Sacramento, Cal., for petitioner. J. Keith Gorham, Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application For Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before THORNBERRY, ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. The Honorable Homer Thornberry, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting
Section 173 - Functions of Service
29 U.S.C. § 173 Cited 380 times
Providing that the "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes. . . ."

Olin Corp.

18 Cited authorities

Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

Holding that an "employee must afford the union the opportunity to act on his behalf

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

In Pincus Brothers, the Third Circuit merely concluded that, under the particular facts of that case, it was "at least arguable" that the employee published a defamatory statement known to be false.

In Banyard v. NLRB, 505 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1974), the District of Columbia Circuit reviewed decisions by the Board to defer to an arbitrator's award.

In Stephenson v. N.L.R.B., 550 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1977), this court also expressly rejected Electronic Reproduction, finding it an "unjustifiable extension" of the Board's deferral policy.

Providing that the "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes. . . ."