§
Olin Conductors

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. N.L.R.B. v. United States Railway Equipment Co.

    424 F.2d 86 (7th Cir. 1970)   Cited 4 times

    No. 17693. February 3, 1970. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Williams, Frank H. Itkin, Marjorie S. Gofreed, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fredric N. Richman, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for respondent; Sidney R. Korshak, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before CASTLE, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and KILEY, Circuit Judge. HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge. This matter