Old King Cole, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Packard Co. v. Labor Board
330 U.S. 485 (1947) Cited 382 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board determinations of unit issues involves a "large measure of informed discretion."
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 times
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills
133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943) Cited 42 times
Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent
Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler
199 F.2d 64 (3d Cir. 1952) Cited 17 times
No. 10718. Argued June 3, 1952. Decided September 30, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen., Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mary Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Richard C. Bull, Philadelphia, Pa. (White, Williams Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. KALODNER
N.L.R.B. v. Stanolind Oil Gas
208 F.2d 239 (10th Cir. 1953) Cited 5 times
No. 4651. November 11, 1953. Robert H. Hurt, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Ft. Worth, Tex. (J.W. Howard, Tulsa, Okla., and Harold E. Mueller, Ft. Worth, Tex., on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Circuit Judge. After a representation hearing on the petition
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Old King Cole, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Packard Co. v. Labor Board

Holding that Board determinations of unit issues involves a "large measure of informed discretion."

Brooks v. Labor Board

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler

N.L.R.B. v. Stanolind Oil Gas

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"