6 Cited authorities
INSTITUT NAT. DES APPELLATIONS v. VINTNERS
958 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Cited 13 timesAffirming finding, on summary judgment, that the term "Chablis" is generic
In re Chemical Dynamics, Inc.
839 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Cited 13 timesConcluding that generalized sales and advertising figures do not establish secondary meaning where the alleged mark is not promoted by itself but instead as part of a larger mark or with other designs or marks
In re Hacot-Colombier
105 F.3d 616 (Fed. Cir. 1997) Cited 4 timesNo. 96-1240. January 21, 1997. Appealed from: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Andrew J. Gray, IV, Jacobson, Price, Holman Stern, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief was Simor L. Moskowitz. Albin F. Drost, Deputy Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, VA, argued, for the Commissioner. With him on the brief were Nancy J. Linck, Solicitor, and Nancy C. Slutter, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Kevin
Application of Servel Inc.
181 F.2d 192 (C.C.P.A. 1950) Cited 5 timesPatent Appeals No. 5658. April 3, 1950. J.L. Kelly, Washington, D.C. (A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C. (Walter J. Derenberg, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, and JOHNSON, Judges. O'CONNELL, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in which the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Marks refusing appellant's application to register
Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification
15 U.S.C. § 1051 Cited 3,806 times 124 Legal AnalysesRequiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark
Section 2.51 - Drawing required
37 C.F.R. § 2.51 Cited 13 timesAllowing a typed drawing for marks consisting of words that are not depicted in special form