ยง

Olaa Sugar Co., Ltd.

118 N.L.R.B. 1442 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Olaa Sugar Co., Ltd.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

    317 U.S. 564 (1943)   Cited 592 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that goods ordered by a wholesaler based on anticipation of need, as opposed to "pursuant to a prior order, contract, or understanding," may no longer be traveling in interstate commerce when delivered to the wholesaler's in-state customers for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act

  2. Roland Co. v. Walling

    326 U.S. 657 (1946)   Cited 173 times
    In Roland Co. v. Walling, 326 U.S. 657, 66 S.Ct. 413, 90 L.Ed. 383 (1946), the Court held inter alia that a business engaged in commercial wiring, electrical contracting for industry, and repair and replacement of electric motors and generators did not constitute a "retail or service establishment."

  3. Walling v. W.D. Haden Co.

    153 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1946)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Walling v. W.D. Haden Co., 153 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1946), the employees involved worked on barges dredging shell material from the ocean floor.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Olaa Sugar Co.

    242 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15143. March 12, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna Blake, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur G. Smith, Smith, Wild, Beebe Cades, J. Edward Collins, James A. King, Bouslog Symonds, Honolulu, Hawaii, and George Andersen, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges. POPE, Circuit Judge. Before us is the petition

  5. North Shore Corporation v. Barnett

    143 F.2d 172 (5th Cir. 1944)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming on the grounds that the time spent by the toll collectors and ticket sellers in exempt activity and in non-exempt activity cannot be segregated

  6. Mitchell v. Stinson

    217 F.2d 210 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 4845, 4846. December 3, 1954. Herbert T. Silsby, II, Ellsworth, Maine, for Calvin Stinson, d.b.a. Stinson Canning Co., etc. Bessie Margolin, Chief of Appellate Litigation, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Sol., Harold S. Saxe, Atty., Washington, D.C., Thomas L. Thistle, Regional Atty., Melrose, Mass., and Albert H. Ross, Atty., Regional Office, Boston, Mass., were on the brief, for James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit

  7. Southern California Freight Lines v. McKeown

    148 F.2d 890 (9th Cir. 1945)   Cited 18 times

    No. 10873. April 21, 1945. Rehearing Denied May 22, 1945. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; J.F.T. O'Connor, Judge. Action by Charles T. McKeown against Southern California Freight Lines to recover overtime compensation pursuant to Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. ยง 201 et seq. From a judgment for plaintiff, 52 F. Supp. 331, defendant appeals. Affirmed. H.J. Bischoff, of San Diego, Cal., for appellant. A.F.

  8. Fleming v. Swift Co.

    41 F. Supp. 825 (N.D. Ill. 1941)   Cited 21 times
    In Fleming v. Swift Co., D.C., 41 F. Supp. 825, 832, the court states: "An employer may not claim an exemption for any employee under sec. 7(c) if the employee during any part of the workweek for which the exemption is claimed does any work which does not fall within the scope of the exemption."

  9. Walling v. Swift Co.

    131 F.2d 249 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 14 times

    No. 7993. October 27, 1942. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Michael L. Igoe, Judge. Action by Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, against Swift Company, to enjoin defendant from violating Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, wherein the Institute of American Meat Packers and Packing House Workers' Organizing Committee intervened. From an adverse judgment, Fleming v

  10. Shain v. Armour Co.

    50 F. Supp. 907 (W.D. Ky. 1943)   Cited 12 times

    No. 256. June 17, 1943. J. Paul Keith, Jr., and Jones, Keith Jones, all of Louisville, Ky., for plaintiffs. R. Lee Blackwell and Bullitt Middleton, all of Louisville, Ky., for defendant. Irving J. Levy, of Washington, D.C., Jeter S. Ray, of Nashville, Tenn., John L. Young, of Versailles, Ky., Leonard E. Ladd, of Nashville, Tenn., and Hugh McCloskey, of New Orleans, La., for United States Department of Labor, amicus curiae. Action by Alfred C. Shain on behalf of himself and others against Armour Company