§

Oklahoma Fixture Co.

314 N.L.R.B. 958 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Oklahoma Fixture Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Esmark, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 739 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 123 times
    Finding "direct participation" theory of liability "limited to situations in which the parent corporation's control over the particular transactions is exercised in disregard of the separate corporate identity of the subsidiary"

  5. Gulf States Mfg. Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    704 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that an employer preserved an issue by ambiguously referencing the issue in a motion for reconsideration

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros. of Ohio, Inc.

    843 F.2d 230 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 7 times
    Granting enforcement of an NLRB order holding that the employer violated Section 8 and of the National Labor Relations Act, finding that the zipper clause did not amount to a relinquishment of the right to bargain over effects of the employer's unilateral shift of production from one bargaining unit to another

  7. Howard Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    436 F.2d 581 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 2 times

    No. 20068. January 4, 1971. Rehearing Denied February 5, 1971. James W. Moore, Smith, Williams, Friday Bowen, Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and GIBSON and LAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its bargaining order entered upon findings of unfair