§

OK Toilet & Towel Supply, Inc.

339 N.L.R.B. 1100 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
OK Toilet & Towel Supply, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Washington Star Co.

    732 F.2d 974 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Washington Star Co., 732 F.2d 974 (D.C. Cir. 1984), exceptions were allowed to be accepted one day late where the Respondent made a good faith effort to comply, the delay was considered "de minimis" and did not result in prejudice to the other party.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Auburn Foundry, Inc.

    791 F.2d 619 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 1 times

    No. 85-2527. Argued February 14, 1986. Decided May 30, 1986. Rehearing Denied June 25, 1986. Elliot Moore, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John R. Burns, III, Baker, Daniels Shoaff, Fort Wayne, Ind., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before POSNER, FLAUM, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. FLAUM, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents a single narrowly defined issue for this court's review: whether this court should refrain from enforcing an NLRB order mandating