§

Oil Transport Co.

182 N.L.R.B. 1016 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Oil Transport Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. American Bread Company v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    In American Bread, it was physically possible for consumers to bring their own bread or go without, just as it was possible for Kroger shoppers to bring their own bags or go without.

  3. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 32 times
    Giving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Air Master Corporation

    339 F.2d 553 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    No. 14777. Argued September 22, 1964. Decided December 14, 1964. Melvin Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert E. Wachs, Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for Air Master Corp. and others Saul C. Waldbaum, Philadelphia, Pa., for Union. Before HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK

  5. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 v. N.L.R.B

    370 F.2d 205 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times

    No. 20655. December 19, 1966. Kenneth M. Schwartz, Robert M. Dohrmann, of Arnold, Smith Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Ralph Kennedy, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent, N.L.R.B. George E. Bodle, Daniel Fogel, Stephen Reinhardt, Loren R. Rothschild, of Bodle Fogel, Los

  6. Cleaver-Brooks Mfg. Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 637 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that a strike protesting the replacement of a supervisor where the evidence showed the strike to be based on mere personal antipathy toward a new foreman was unprotected activity.