Ohio Public Interest Campaign

14 Cited authorities

  1. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 (1976)   Cited 3,461 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression
  2. N. A. A. C. P. v. Alabama

    357 U.S. 449 (1958)   Cited 1,974 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[c]ompelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs" may violate the First Amendment
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  4. Schaumburg v. Citizens for Better Environ

    444 U.S. 620 (1980)   Cited 692 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "charitable appeals for funds, on the street or door-to-door, involve a variety of speech interests — communication of information, the dissemination and propagation of views and ideas, and the advocacy of causes — that are within the protection of the First Amendment"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop

    440 U.S. 490 (1979)   Cited 459 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
  6. Okla. Press Pub. Co. v. Walling

    327 U.S. 186 (1946)   Cited 813 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although agency must defend purpose behind investigation, it is not required to prove cause of action at subpoena enforcement stage
  7. Murdock v. Pennsylvania

    319 U.S. 105 (1943)   Cited 854 times
    Holding that the hand distribution of religious materials are protected speech
  8. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional

    372 U.S. 10 (1963)   Cited 284 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"
  9. Associated Press v. Labor Board

    301 U.S. 103 (1937)   Cited 257 times
    Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"
  10. Polish Alliance v. Labor Board

    322 U.S. 643 (1944)   Cited 138 times
    In Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.
  11. Section 103.1 - Colleges and universities

    29 C.F.R. § 103.1   Cited 4 times

    The Board will assert its jurisdiction in any proceeding arising under sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Act involving any private nonprofit college or university which has a gross annual revenue from all sources (excluding only contributions which, because of limitation by the grantor, are not available for use for operating expenses) of not less than $1 million. 29 C.F.R. §103.1 35 FR 18370, Dec. 3, 1970