ยง

Ohio Car & Truck Leasing, Inc.

149 N.L.R.B. 1423 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Ohio Car & Truck Leasing, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8

  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wings Wheels, Inc.

    324 F.2d 495 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14407. Argued October 24, 1963. Decided November 7, 1963. Robert Sewell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Roland Morris, Philadelphia, Pa. (Duane, Morris Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This case

  5. Lion Oil Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    245 F.2d 376 (8th Cir. 1957)   Cited 7 times

    No. 15158. June 5, 1957. Jeff Davis, El Dorado, Ark. (B.L. Allen and H.D. Dickens, El Dorado, Ark., were with him on the brief), for petitioners. Duane Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. VOGEL, Circuit Judge. When this case