§

O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc.

295 N.L.R.B. 463 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

    405 U.S. 117 (1972)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Berger Transfer Storage Co.

    678 F.2d 679 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 52 times
    Observing that "when the questions asked `viewed and interpreted as the employee must have understood the questioning and its ramifications, could reasonably coerce or intimidate the employee with regard to union activities,' a violation has been established"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dorothy Shamrock Coal Co.

    833 F.2d 1263 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 34 times
    Stating that "comments demonstrate a `manifest hostility' toward union activity . . . are relevant in determining the Company's motive for its conduct"

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. Wright v. Stokes

    167 Ill. App. 3d 887 (Ill. App. Ct. 1988)   Cited 21 times
    Finding a guilty plea is proper evidence against a defendant in a civil proceeding arising from the same incident where the underlying charge was dismissed after the defendant successfully completed supervision; Ill. R. Evid. 803 (eff. Apr. 26, 2012) (limiting the hearsay exception for previous convictions to crimes "punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year")

  8. Automobile Salesmen's Union v. N.L.R.B

    711 F.2d 383 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    Summarizing post-1982 standard for finding violations of the Act in disciplinary actions taken against supervisors

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Del Rey Tortilleria, Inc.

    787 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 20 times

    No. 85-1199. Argued January 7, 1986. Decided April 2, 1986. Joseph Oertel, Dep. Assoc. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Irving M. Geslewitz, Adams, Fox, Adelstein Rosen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WOOD and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) petitions this court to enforce an order requiring respondent

  10. People v. Oswald

    106 Ill. App. 3d 645 (Ill. App. Ct. 1982)   Cited 18 times
    In Oswald, the second district appellate court conducted plain error review, reasoning that the waived issue was a matter of law concerning the construction of the supervision statute, the trial court had made a determination as to its interpretation of the statute, and the alleged error did not arise until the entry of the judgment dismissing the charges.