§

Ogihara America Corp.

347 N.L.R.B. 110 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Ogihara America Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  4. Roadmaster Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    874 F.2d 448 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 24 times
    In Roadmaster Corp. v. NLRB, 874 F.2d 448, 451-54 (7th Cir.1989), the Seventh Circuit held that a union official who signed an employee's name to a grievance without the employee's permission was entitled to the protection of the NLRA. More recently, in OPW Fueling Components v. NLRB, 443 F.3d 490, 493-97 (6th Cir.2006), the Sixth Circuit held that a union official who signed the names of two involuntarily transferred employees to a grievance without their permission was entitled to the protection of the NLRA.

  5. OPW Fueling Components v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    443 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 04-2563, 05-1083. Argued: November 28, 2005. Decided and Filed: April 6, 2006. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc, July 28, 2006. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Michael W. Hawkins, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Michael W. Hawkins, Colleen P. Lewis, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, Aileen A. Armstrong, Jill A. Griffin

  6. Atlantic-Pacific Const. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    52 F.3d 260 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 6 times
    Approving of letter written to complain about direct supervisor

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc.

    942 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-2795. Argued January 14, 1991. Decided September 4, 1991. Barbara A. Atkin, Judith P. Flower, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, William A. Baudler (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Gary A. Wincek (argued), William L. Becker, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, Ill., Nancy M. Watkins, Wilburn, Suggs Watkins, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Tamara Foods, Inc.

    692 F.2d 1171 (8th Cir. 1982)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding § 502 inapplicable in a case where there was no collective bargaining agreement

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Plastilite Corporation

    375 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18443. March 30, 1967. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Burton L. Raimi, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief with her. John E. Tate, of Nelson, Harding, Acklie, Leonard Tate, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. This case is