Offshore Shipbuilding, Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization
420 U.S. 50 (1975) Cited 125 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA
N.L.R.B. v. Sacramento Clinical Laboratory
623 F.2d 110 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 9 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 79-7481. Argued and Submitted July 8, 1980. Decided July 11, 1980. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kathleen M. Kelly, argued and J. Richard Thesing, on brief, Little, Mendelson, Fastiff Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and HUG, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: We are asked to enforce three orders of the Board finding Sacramento Clinical Laboratory