§

Office Employees Local 251 (Sandia National Laboratories)

331 N.L.R.B. 1417 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Office Employees Local 251 (Sandia National Laboratories)

54 Cited authorities

  1. Hall v. Cole

    412 U.S. 1 (1973)   Cited 962 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs acted on behalf of all union members, and reimbursing the attorneys' fees from the union treasury, such that all union members in effect equally contributed to the costs of litigation

  2. Trbovich v. Mine Workers

    404 U.S. 528 (1972)   Cited 920 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union member's interest was not adequately represented by the Secretary of Labor because the Secretary had a "duty to serve two distinct interests, which are related, but not identical:" that of the individual union member and that of the general public

  3. Finnegan v. Leu

    456 U.S. 431 (1982)   Cited 298 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that status as a union employee or appointed officer is not a membership right within a union and is not protected by the LMRDA

  4. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  5. Furniture Moving Drivers v. Crowley

    467 U.S. 526 (1984)   Cited 212 times
    Holding that "the exclusivity provision included in § 403 of Title IV plainly bars Title I relief when an individual union member challenges the validity of an election that has already been completed"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  7. Sheet Metal Workers v. Lynn

    488 U.S. 347 (1989)   Cited 165 times
    Holding that removal of an elected union official by a trustee because the official opposed a proposed dues increase was a violation of Title I of the LMRDA

  8. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

  10. Boilermakers v. Hardeman

    401 U.S. 233 (1971)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that secion 412 of the LMRDA explicitly vests district courts with jurisdiction over LMRDA claims

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  12. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,062 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

  13. Section 411 - Bill of rights; constitution and bylaws of labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 411   Cited 1,747 times
    Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action

  14. Section 481 - Terms of office and election procedures

    29 U.S.C. § 481   Cited 601 times
    Characterizing the right for elections to "be conducted in accordance with the constitution and bylaws of such organization" as a right under Title IV, to be enforced by the Secretary of Labor

  15. Section 482 - Enforcement

    29 U.S.C. § 482   Cited 518 times
    Requiring exhaustion of internal remedies before member may file complaint with the Secretary; also providing that challenged elections shall be presumed valid pending final decision on Title IV violation

  16. Section 413 - Retention of existing rights of members

    29 U.S.C. § 413   Cited 61 times
    Nothing in this title "shall limit the rights and remedies of any member of a labor organization under any State or Federal law or before any other court or tribunal"

  17. Section 523 - Retention of rights under other Federal and State laws

    29 U.S.C. § 523   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Except as explicitly provided to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall reduce or limit the responsibilities of any labor organization or any officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative of a labor organization, or of any trust in which a labor organization is interested, under any other Federal law or under the laws of any State, and, except as explicitly provided to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall take away any right or bar any remedy to which members of a labor organization

  18. Section 452.97 - Secret ballot

    29 C.F.R. § 452.97   Cited 2 times

    (a) A prime requisite of elections regulated by title IV is that they be held by secret ballot among the members or in appropriate cases by representatives who themselves have been elected by secret ballot among the members. A secret ballot under the Act is "the expression by ballot, voting machine, or otherwise, but in no event by proxy, of a choice * * * cast in such a manner that the person expressing such choice cannot be identified with the choice expressed." Secrecy may be assured by the use