§

Observer & Eccentric Newspapers

340 N.L.R.B. 124 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Observer & Eccentric Newspapers

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  3. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  4. Graham Arch. Products Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 534 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 25 times
    Arguing for judicial review of second-election orders in the certification context

  5. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    984 F.2d 556 (1st Cir. 1993)   Cited 13 times
    Concluding that an employer violated § 8 by threatening to have union organizers who were distributing handbills on public property arrested

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.

  7. Paceco v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 180 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In Paceco, as here, the employer contended that its rules may have only technically violated the Act and it had attempted to rewrite them to remove the defect.