§

Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

348 N.L.R.B. 686 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

32 Cited authorities

  1. Duncan v. Walker

    533 U.S. 167 (2001)   Cited 5,604 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statute of limitations is not tolled during the pendancy of a federal petition

  2. Dolan v. Postal Service

    546 U.S. 481 (2006)   Cited 680 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "negligent transmission" of postal matter "does not comprehend all negligence occurring in the course of mail delivery"

  3. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 427 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 761 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  5. Eldred v. Ashcroft

    537 U.S. 186 (2003)   Cited 195 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “every idea, theory, and fact in a copyrighted work becomes instantly available for public exploitation at the moment of publication.”

  6. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 181 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  7. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 249 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

    444 U.S. 672 (1980)   Cited 183 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

  10. Packard Co. v. Labor Board

    330 U.S. 485 (1947)   Cited 382 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board determinations of unit issues involves a "large measure of informed discretion."

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,216 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”

  12. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,445 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it