§
Oakland Mall

8 Cited authorities

  1. DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council

    485 U.S. 568 (1988)   Cited 732 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"

  2. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 555 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  3. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  4. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  5. Lechmere, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    914 F.2d 313 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 15 times

    No. 89-1683. Heard January 10, 1990. Decided September 17, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 25, 1990. Robert P. Joy, with whom Keith H. McCown and Morgan, Brown Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Richard A. Cohen, Atty., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for review of an order of the National

  6. Emery Realty, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 1259 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 11 times
    In Emery Realty, Inc. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 1259, 1264 (6th Cir. 1988), the court affirmed a Board decision finding that it was an unfair labor practice for a property owner to refuse to allow union handbilling.

  7. Sentry Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    914 F.2d 113 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 89-2883, 89-3261. Argued June 4, 1990. Decided September 26, 1990. David W. Croysdale and Robert M. Ling, Jr., Michael, Best Friedrich; and Kenneth R. Loebel, Previant, Goldberg, Uelman, Gratz, Miller Brueggeman, Milwaukee, Wis., for Sentry Markets Inc. Aileen A. Armstrong, Howard E. Perlstein, Joseph H. Bornong, Linda J. Dreeben, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, John C. Truesdale, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., and Philip E. Bloedorn, and Paul Bosanac, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee

  8. Farah Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    450 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 71-1097, 71-1688. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. October 13, 1971. Tommy B. Duke, Neil Martin, Houston, Tex., Kenneth R. Carr, El Paso, Tex., for Farah Manufacturing Co.; Fulbright, Crooker Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, for El Paso District Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO; Clifford D. Reznicek, Donald D. Congress