§
Nynex Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  3. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  4. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged

  7. Ad Art, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    645 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times

    No. 78-3371. Argued February 14, 1980. Submitted May 22, 1980. Decided December 9, 1980. As Amended January 30, 1981. Archie G. Parker, Rowland Parker, Sacramento, Cal., for petitioner. J. Keith Gorham, Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application For Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before THORNBERRY, ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. The Honorable Homer Thornberry, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    106 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 23 times
    In American Manufacturing the court upheld the Board's finding that the discharges were discriminatory against union personnel since some of the persons who did not return to work were not discharged.