§

NT-MDT LLC v. Irina S. Kozodaeva

92071349 (T.T.A.B. Apr. 14, 2021)
NT-MDT LLC v. Irina S. Kozodaeva

24 Cited authorities

  1. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

    572 U.S. 118 (2014)   Cited 3,106 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the respondent could not "obtain relief" under § 1125 "without evidence of injury proximately caused by [the petitioner's] alleged misrepresentations"

  2. Hana Fin., Inc. v. Hana Bank

    574 U.S. 418 (2015)   Cited 97 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Abrogating prior decisions holding this was a legal question

  3. On-Line Careline, Inc. v. America Online

    229 F.3d 1080 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 78 times
    Applying Recot in analyzing the similarity of services

  4. Aycock Eng. v. Airflite

    560 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 46 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that applicant's preparation to use the mark was insufficient to constitute use in commerce

  5. Ritchie v. Simpson

    170 F.3d 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding “real interest” is shown by “a direct and personal stake in the outcome” or a “legitimate personal interest.”

  6. Cerveceria Centroamericana v. Cerveceria

    892 F.2d 1021 (Fed. Cir. 1989)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in the absence of evidence of intent to resume use during the period of non-use, the TTAB "may conclude the registrant has . . . failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment," even when there is evidence of intent to resume after the period of nonuse

  7. Corcamore, LLC v. SFM, LLC

    978 F.3d 1298 (Fed. Cir. 2020)   Cited 10 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Lexmark controls the statutory cause of action analysis under § 1064

  8. Visa, U.S.A. v. Birmingham Trust Nat. Bank

    696 F.2d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 1982)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that a "naked assignment" of a trademark without the accompanying goodwill was valid because it did not serve to confuse consumers

  9. Hydro-Dynamics, Inc., v. George Putnam Co.

    811 F.2d 1470 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 42 times
    Recognizing that single bona fide shipment in commerce may support registration

  10. Ilco Corp. v. Ideal Security Hardware Corp.

    527 F.2d 1221 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that use of one mark can inure to the benefit of a related mark only if they provide a "single and continuing commercial impression"

  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 96,351 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint

  12. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,921 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  13. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,047 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  14. Section 1057 - Certificates of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1057   Cited 1,056 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a certificate of registration is prima facie evidence of an owner's right to use the mark

  15. Section 1064 - Cancellation of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1064   Cited 932 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a petition to cancel a certification mark if the registered owner "discriminately refuses to certify" qualifying goods or services

  16. Section 1060 - Assignment

    15 U.S.C. § 1060   Cited 193 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Requiring assignments of federal trademark registrations to be "by instruments in writing"

  17. Section 1063 - Opposition to registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1063   Cited 148 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Identifying "dilution by blurring ... under section 1125(c) as a permissible grounds for opposition to a registration"

  18. Section 2.88 - Statement of use after notice of allowance

    37 C.F.R. § 2.88   Cited 10 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Describing the USPTO's requirements for filing a statement of use

  19. Section 2.20 - Declarations in lieu of oaths

    37 C.F.R. § 2.20   Cited 8 times   7 Legal Analyses

    Instead of an oath, affidavit, or sworn statement, the language of 28 U.S.C. 1746 , or the following declaration language, may be used: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. 1001 , and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and

  20. Section 2.193 - Trademark correspondence and signature requirements

    37 C.F.R. § 2.193   Cited 4 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a)Signature required. Each piece of correspondence that requires a signature must bear: (1) A handwritten signature personally signed in permanent ink by the person named as the signatory, or a true copy thereof; or (2) An electronic signature that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section, personally entered by the person named as the signatory. The Office will accept an electronic signature that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section on correspondence filed on paper

  21. Section 2.173 - Amendment of registration

    37 C.F.R. § 2.173   Cited 4 times

    (a)Form of amendment. The owner of a registration may apply to amend a registration or to disclaim part of the mark in the registration. The owner must submit a written request specifying the amendment or disclaimer. If the registration is involved in an inter partes proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the request must be filed by appropriate motion to the Board. (b)Requirements for request. A request for amendment or disclaimer must: (1) Include the fee required by § 2.6 ; (2)

  22. Section 2.76 - Amendment to allege use

    37 C.F.R. § 2.76   Cited 3 times
    Requiring three specimens to support the declared date of the first use of the mark in commerce