§

NSL COUNTRY GARDENS, LLC

01-CA-223025 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 7, 2019)
NSL COUNTRY GARDENS, LLC

15 Cited authorities

  1. Pillay v. I.N.S.

    45 F.3d 14 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 306 times
    Holding that this Court has "inherent authority . . . to dismiss an appeal or petition for review as frivolous when the appeal or petition presents no arguably meritorious issue for our consideration"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally

  5. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  6. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  7. Local Joint Exec. Bd. v. National Labor rel

    515 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 8 times

    No. 05-75515. Argued and Submitted October 16, 2007. Filed January 28, 2008. Kristin Martin (argued), Richard G. McCracken, Davis, Cowell, Bowe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Brian Herman (argued), Mark J. Ricciardi, Fisher Phillips, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for intervenor Reorganized Aladdin Gaming, LLC. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor

  8. SFO Good-Nite Inn, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    700 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1295 11–1325. 2012-11-20 SFO GOOD–NITE INN, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Patrick W. Jordan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Nanette Joslyn. MacKenzie Fillow, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben,

  9. Medco Health Solutions of Las Vegas, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    701 F.3d 710 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that employer satisfied its burden of establishing special circumstances to justify ban on particular t-shirt mocking company program

  10. Unite Here v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    546 F.3d 239 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 5 times
    Affirming the Board's decision in N. Am. Pipe Corp., 347 N.L.R.B. 836