§
Novotel New York

47 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,729 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. N.A.A.C.P. v. Button

    371 U.S. 415 (1963)   Cited 2,232 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Virginia failed to "justify the broad prohibitions" imposed through a barratry law, but enjoining the statute only as applied to the politically oriented litigating efforts of the NAACP

  3. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 988 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  4. Automobile Workers v. Brock

    477 U.S. 274 (1986)   Cited 416 times
    Holding that participation of individuals was not required where the district court would not determine damages because "the unique facts of each UAW member's claim will have to be considered by the proper state authorities [post-judgment] before any member will be able to receive the benefits allegedly due him"

  5. Ellis v. Railway Clerks

    466 U.S. 435 (1984)   Cited 390 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union conventions, social activities, and publications were chargeable so long as they did not relate to political causes

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 435 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  7. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,507 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

  8. Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn

    389 U.S. 217 (1967)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union had a First Amendment right to employ a salaried attorney to represent members pursuing workers' compensation claims

  9. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb

    331 U.S. 722 (1947)   Cited 874 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding the FLSA contains "no definition that solves problems as to the limits of the employer-employee relationship under the Act"

  10. Thomas v. Collins

    323 U.S. 516 (1945)   Cited 889 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"

  11. Section 201 - Short title

    29 U.S.C. § 201   Cited 21,734 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work

  12. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 15,350 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include

  13. Section 255 - Statute of limitations

    29 U.S.C. § 255   Cited 4,731 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that not all FLSA wage and overtime claims are willful

  14. Section 256 - Determination of commencement of future actions

    29 U.S.C. § 256   Cited 950 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that an opt-in plaintiff's action commences, for purposes of the limitations period, when he files his written consent to join

  15. Section 801 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    30 U.S.C. § 801   Cited 429 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Identifying “an urgent need to provide more effective means and measures for improving the working conditions and practices in the Nation's coal or other mines in order to prevent death and serious physical harm, and in order to prevent occupational diseases originating in such mines”

  16. Section 790.21 - Time for bringing employee suits

    29 C.F.R. § 790.21   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "a cause of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act for . . . unpaid overtime compensation . . . 'accrues' when the employer fails to pay the required compensation for any workweek at the regular pay day for the period in which the workweek ends"