§

Nova Plumbing, Inc.

336 N.L.R.B. 633 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Nova Plumbing, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 426 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  3. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  4. Sheet Metal Workers' Inter'l v. Herre Bros

    201 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 1999)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer acted inconsistently with its noticed intent to withdraw from group bargaining where employer repeatedly requested information and spoke with negotiators concerning a contract to take effect after the date of withdrawal

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Triple C Maintenance, Inc.

    219 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing voluntary recognition under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Destileria Serrales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    882 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1989)   Cited 13 times

    No. 88-1659. Argued March 1, 1989. Decided August 16, 1989. Francisco Chevere with whom Donald M. Hall and McConnell Valdes Kelley Sifre Griggs Ruiz-Suria, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for petitioner. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Installation Co.

    219 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Middleboro Fire Apparatus, Inc.

    590 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times

    No. 78-1173. Argued October 4, 1978. Decided December 20, 1978. Alan Banov, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Bernstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence M. Siskind, Brockton, Mass., with whom Ann-Louise Levine, Brockton, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition from National Labor