§

Norton Audubon Hospital

338 N.L.R.B. 320 (N.L.R.B. 2002)
Norton Audubon Hospital

11 Cited authorities

  1. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  2. Carry Companies of Illinois, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    30 F.3d 922 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 34 times
    Acknowledging that, "where an employer establishes a regular pattern of overlooking certain violations of company policy, the employer may not later rely on such violations to satisfy its burden under Wright Line."

  3. Medeco Sec. Locks v. National Lab. rel

    142 F.3d 733 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no substantial evidence of knowledge could be inferred from the company's decision to fire a worker within a year after he had ceased to be a visible supporter of the union and had disavowed further interest in the union

  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  5. Ross Stores, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    235 F.3d 669 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that when the Board found that there was "no sufficient objective basis" for finding that employees viewed a statement as a threat, § 158(c) "plainly bars the Board not only from finding the speech was an unfair labor practice ... but also from using it as ‘evidence of an unfair labor practice.’ "

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. BE & K Construction Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1372 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 11 times

    No. 96-6776. Filed October 27, 1997. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Alabama Case). (NLRB No. Before BIRCH, Circuit Judge, FAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and COHILL, Senior District Judge. Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: In this labor case, BE K Construction Company ("BE K") petitions for review and the National Labor Relations

  8. Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    126 F.3d 246 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 96-1572 96-1604. Argued March 5, 1997. Decided September 11, 1997. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (6-CA-26669) ARGUED: Steven Robert Wall, MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS, L.L.P., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioners. Jill Ann Griffin, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Barry E. Gosin, MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS, L.L.P., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioners. Frederick L. Feinstein

  9. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    984 F.2d 556 (1st Cir. 1993)   Cited 13 times
    Concluding that an employer violated § 8 by threatening to have union organizers who were distributing handbills on public property arrested

  10. Holo-Krome Co. v. N.L.R.B

    907 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Holding the Board's use of employer's protected expressions of opinion against union as a basis for finding animus to be contrary to section 8(c)