§

Northwest Protective Service

342 N.L.R.B. 1201 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Northwest Protective Service

9 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  2. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  3. Labor Board v. Jones Laughlin Co.

    331 U.S. 416 (1947)   Cited 88 times
    In Jones Laughlin, the employer refused to negotiate with a unit of plant guards because the guards had been sworn in as auxiliary police of the United States Army during World War II, a fact which, in the view of the employer, made it particularly inappropriate to allow them to unionize.

  4. General Serv. Employees, Local 73 v. N.L.R.B

    230 F.3d 909 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 5 times

    No. 99-2577. Argued February 10, 2000. Decided October 16, 2000. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. Craig Becker (argued), Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, IL, Anna Francis (argued), Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Jeffrey W. Pagano, King, Pagano Harrison, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae. Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and COFFEY and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges. DIANE

  5. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807 v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that second clause of section 9(b) "denies" union representing non-guards "the right to be certified as a representative of a unit of guards"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Los Angeles New Hospital

    640 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    No. 80-7073. Argued and Submitted November 5, 1980. Decided March 6, 1981. Susan L. Dolin, Richard M. Fischl, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Catherine Hagen, O'Melveny Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and TANG, Circuit Judges, and HANSON, Senior District Judge. The Honorable William C. Hanson, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern and Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation

  7. N.L.R.B. v. White Superior Div., White Motor

    404 F.2d 1100 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    Refusing to create an exception to section 8(b) for uncertified unions, because Congress did not do so

  8. N.L.R.B. v. SuCrest Corporation

    409 F.2d 765 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 114-116, Dockets 32433-32435. Argued October 30, 1968. Decided March 24, 1969. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Iran D. Lanoff, Atty., NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Morton L. Deitch, New York City (Stroock Stroock Lavan and David L. Finkelman, New York City, on the brief), for respondent SuCrest Corp. Joel Field, New York City (Schulman, Abarbanel Kroner and Howard

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Burke Oldsmobile Inc.

    288 F.2d 14 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    No. 259, Docket 26626. Argued February 17, 1961. Decided March 27, 1961. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Irving T. Bush, Miller Bush, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, SMITH and HAND, Circuit Judges. HAND, Circuit Judge. This case comes up on a petition of the Labor Board for an order requiring the respondent, Burke